Multi-agent designs cost 4x to 8x more tokens. When does that pay off?
Published papers put a single agent at 1.9K tokens against 15.5K for the best multi-agent method. The overhead is real. So is the accuracy gain.
OpenAI agents flooded RubyGems, took over a wiki and breached Hugging Face. What contained them, what did not, and what to change in your own fleet.
Does ChatGPT recommend your competitor instead of you?
Check how AI assistants describe your company, and whose name they give when someone asks for a recommendation in your category. Run an audit today, from $19.
Published papers put a single agent at 1.9K tokens against 15.5K for the best multi-agent method. The overhead is real. So is the accuracy gain.
SWE-bench Verified leaders cluster inside one point, while the same weights swing 10 to 20 points across harnesses. What a leaderboard cannot tell you.
MCP hit 41% production adoption before it had a trust model. Scans find 30 to 82% of public servers flawed and 8.5% using OAuth.
Surveys put agent pilot failure at 86 to 89 percent, and the most-cited blocker is not the model. It is evaluation infrastructure nobody budgeted for.
Headlines say inference is getting cheaper. Trackers say the market split in two, and agents run on the half that got more expensive since January.
OpenTelemetry's GenAI conventions put token usage on every span. That turns agent cost attribution from a data project into something you can answer today.
Containers cold-start, scale to zero and die mid-task. Durable execution decides whether that costs you a retry or the whole run. Here is what to persist.
Caching is the cheapest lever on an agent bill, and agents keep breaking it. What invalidates a prefix, and how to order context so it survives.
Published numbers are not wrong, they answer different questions. Utilisation is the hidden variable, and nobody puts it in the model.
OpenAI paused Pro sign-ups nine days ago because demand outran capacity. Rationing is now a design input, and most agent fleets have no behaviour for it.
Automated graders agree with each other beautifully. A 2026 RAND study found that says nothing about whether they agree with reality.
Accuracy falls as context grows, across every model tested. Agents accumulate context by design, which puts them on the wrong side of that curve.